Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr: Campaign PhotoMANCHESTER -- Libertarian presidential nominee Bob Barr paid his first visit to New Hampshire where a recent poll shows him with 10 percent of the vote.
Barr, a former Republican U.S. House member from Georgia, was nominated at the Libertarian National Convention in Denver over the Memorial Day weekend.
"We need to make sure that in every American beats a heart of a Libertarian," Barr told supporters at Murphy's Taproom. "Every American is Libertarian about something."
Barr used his stump speech to discuss the recently passed amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and his desire to end "government intrusion" into the lives of Americans.
Before the event, Barr told reporters that he does not see himself as a spoiler in the race. "I prefer to look at it from the standpoint that each candidate is in charge of their destiny."
Referencing the Republican and Democratic parties, he added that "at the end of the day the two roads come together."
Questions remain whether or not Barr will appear on the November ballot. Former Libertarian presidential candidate George Phillies will appear on the ballot because early this year the party collected the necessary signatures before Barr entered the race, thus voters might have the choice of voting for two Libertarian candidates.
Brendon Kelly, chairman of the New Hampshire Libertarian Party, said it appears that Barr will reach the minimum amount of 3,000 signatures but added that he would like to garner 5,000. "We were collecting signatures [for Phillies] but I think we should go along with the national party," Kelly said.
According to Kelly, the party used to have 400 due-paying members but reached a low-point of 150 in 2005. He said that since then the numbers have been steadily increasing since the Libertarian Party became an official party in 2006.
The year 2008 brought many fun memories for New Hampshire political junkies. From Hillary's tear in Portsmouth to the >
Another county that moved toward the Democrats in the 1960s and 1970s was Carroll County. By the end of the ‘70s, Carroll was still strongly ... >
Free stater nuts
It looks like the libertarian radicals have taken over the NH Advantage Coalition. Dave Ridley had to be restrained by the police after he hassled kids outside of Manchester City Hall. It's a shame that decent people like Mike Biundo and Frank Guinta are being used by these out of state radicals.
http://www.ridleyreport.com/video/2008/jul/manchester_nh_second_pair_cop...
I feel terribly sorry for the Libertarian Party
If they have to nominate Bob Barr as a candidate in order to get any attention. Barr's further from a true Libertarian than McCain. I guess that at some point, everyone ends up having to put politics over principles, and the Libs are no exception.
A Declaration of Withdrawal from the Republican Party
My reasons for leaving the Party that I’ve felt at home in since I became politically aware are numerous. I will start with quoting countless conservatives who feel as I do - I didn’t so much leave the Republican Party, it was the Party that left me. The elected Republican officials failed to implement a conservative agenda, despite having the Presidency and both houses of congress. No Child Left Behind, Prescription Drug Entitlements; they even tried to force Amnesty for illegal aliens upon us. They have given us a government that would make even LBJ blush. Our businesses and land have more regulatory red tape to deal with than ever.
Where is the Republican Party that stood for limited government, personal responsibility, a strong national defense, and against being the world’s policeman? As recently as the 90’s Republicans railed against a foreign policy of “making the world safe for democracy”, (which is historically the Democrats foreign policy, ala Woodrow Wilson) when Bill Clinton was President and he took us to war in Bosnia and Kosovo, without U.N. approval I might add. Which reminds me, the United Nations is something the GOP used to believe we needed to get out of, not an institution to be defended when a rogue nation violates U.N. resolutions.
I am also reminded of former Senator Robert Taft, who was known in his day as Mr. Republican, when he said “I do not believe any policy which has behind it the threat of military force is justified as part of the basic foreign policy of the United States except to defend the liberty of our own people” and my favorite President - Thomas Jefferson, who said “peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, and entangling alliances with none.”
From its inception, the Republican Party advocated a humble foreign policy in line with our founding fathers recommendations, now, with John McCain as the leader and voice of the GOP, we are told to get behind his idea for a “League of Democracies” which sounds terrifyingly similar to Wilson and his Progressive Democrats “League of Nations” almost 100 years ago.
We are also being told by McCain that we will have to Cap and Trade our liberty and our pursuit of happiness in the fight against global warming, essentially that if we don’t give government more money and power, utopia will never be reached.
Some have told me that I should support him because he will appoint conservative judges, but I ask these questions - 1. Who’s definition of conservative are we talking about? And 2. Why would I trust the man on this issue when he is one of the “Gang of 14” who was blocking President Bush’s conservative lower federal court and Circuit Courts of Appeal judicial nominees? His long-standing, but little-noticed association with left-wing donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics and definitely troubles me. I would also remind you of his historical propensity to appease those even more liberal than himself. His version of “reaching across the aisle” looks more like a group hug when he crafts legislation like the McCain / Kennedy and McCain / Feingold bills. McCain / Feingold happens to be the reason McCain should not get the NRA’s endorsement, the NRA spent years fighting this trampling of our 1st amendment rights. McCain has not been the solid 2nd amendment supporter he would like you to believe he is - he cosponsored legislation which could require registration of attendees at gun shows and even ban such shows. Add to this the barely passing “C” grade from the NRA in his last senate run in 04‘, the “F” grade the Gun Owners of America gives him today and reflect on the work he did in 2000 with Americans for Gun Safety, an anti-gun group with a deceiving name, and you get a very different picture than the one he wants us to see.
The differences between McCain and Obama are minimal, when you consider that both believe big government can save you from yourself, and that we can save other nations from themselves as well. Given McCain’s track record of conciliatory dealings with Democrats, I fear what this man would do with a Democratic House and Senate. I will not play along with the game of lesser of two evils, as I believe that is part of what has plunged this nation into the mess we find ourselves today.
Once upon a time the Republican Party stood against special interests, corruption and abuse of power. Today their candidates campaign is “ of the lobbyist, by the lobbyist, for the lobbyist.” A man who admits Washington’s corruption has tainted him. Google Keating 5 and read all about it.
The Republican Party today would be unrecognizable to my favorite Republicans of yesterday, such as Barry Goldwater, who said “ A government that is big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take it all away.” President Eisenhower, who warned us of the Military Industrial Complex, and one whose party membership is a surprise to many today but shouldn’t be, Martin Luther King Jr. “ Violence is a poor chisel for carving out peaceful tomorrows.” The party is just as unrecognizable to myself and others of my generation.
I had to draw a line in the sand, and the Republican Party wasted no time in crossing it, when they and the President pushed for “economic stimulus checks.” The only problem is this, the money isn’t money that we have, its money we are borrowing, and our excessive borrowing becomes a tax on future generations, as we wont be paying it off any time soon. Want to try to sell this as economically conservative? Excessive borrowing and spending has the added affect of devaluing our currency, so it acts as a hidden tax on us today. As I heard one of the presidential candidates say in regards to these stimulus checks, “ Whose economy are we stimulating here? Ours or Chinas? We are borrowing more money from China so everyone can go buy more stuff made in China.” I get it, others in the GOP get it, so why doesn’t the party leadership?
I can’t take anymore disrespect for conservative values, and unless the Republican Party wakes up and gets it’s head on straight real soon, I will be taking my vote, my time, energy, money, and passion from the GOP and taking it to the Libertarian Party to send a message to the Republican leadership that I will not be taken for granted. I believe that it is solid conservatism that wins the day and elections - limited government, individual responsibility, and a strong national DEFENSE (secure the borders!), not conciliation and surrender to Democrats to the point that our differences become blurry.
The Libertarian Party seems to be a perfect temporary home, the GOP has its work cut out if its sincere about winning me back, even President Reagan said “Libertarianism is the very heart and soul of conservatism.” I will be doing everything I can to sway like minded conservatives to join me in this exodus and vote for Bob Barr for President and Wayne Root for Vice President on the Libertarian ticket. Both of them were recently Republicans, and are among those countless conservatives I‘ve heard myself say “ It wasn’t that I left the Republican Party, it was the Party that left me.”
Thanks and God Bless, from Zak Carter
Wow
that's the least accurate description of what happened to Ridley. He asked a crowd of young people coming out of town hall (some of them of voting age) if they wanted to sign the spending cap petition, and their government-payrolled chaperon flipped out. She went and told the cops that Ridley was "harassing" them (I guess all petitioning is harassment, depending how you look at it), and sicced them on Ridley.
Get your story straight before calling people radicals and implying that they are not decent people.
The picture that has been painted here is that Ridley tried to shout at a kindergarten class until they ran away scared. In reality, they were between 14 and 21 and work for some city-funded program that pays minors (why can't I do that at my business?) to do city beautification.
Dave Ridley and Rowland
who is masquerading as RandolphCarter777 are doing wonderful work. Their sheer obnoxiousness will drive people away from the GOP in droves - and we all know that in NH, libertarians vote for the GOP.
I am definitely not
I am definitely not "Rowland" - he's like 40 years older than me.
Dave Ridley is an embarassment
Randloph Carter:
Why doesn't Ridley show the video of what he actually said to the kids? This guy tapes himself clipping his toenails, so he must have taped this encounter as well.
The police already consider Ridley a bit of a screwball. He struts around downtown with a gun and a camcorder trying to provoke confrontations, and mouths off like a 13 year old when the police ask what he's doing.
If the NH Advantage Coalition and the Manchester GOP want to be associated with this guy, they had better be prepared for some serious backlash when Ridley's games become widely known. Biundo and Infantine should know better than to jump in bed with the "porcupine" crowd.
Maybe...
Because he doesn't take videos of anyone until they attempt to infringe on his rights? And he had no reason to be filming a group of young people?
Dave does (emphatically) NOT try to cause incidents. Open carry is a fundamental right that our state supposedly recognizes. I would think that a liberal would appreciate Dave's work in exposing the occasional ridiculousness of law enforcement here in Manchester and throughout New Hampshire.
Walking around the very
Walking around the very neighborhood where Mike Briggs was murdered while wearing a gun on your hip isn't looking to cause trouble?
Whatever you're drinking, Randolph, I want some of it!
S,
Are you one of those people who think that women who dress provocatively are "asking to be raped"? I can't imagine another explanation for someone claiming that exercising your rights as a free American is the same as "looking to cause trouble".
Distractions everywhere
There's far more important issues to be discussed than what one man is doing with his gun, his camera, and his petitions. Unless you have some evidence that he has either engaged in criminal activity or injured someone or something (other than the sensibilities of a chaperon) you're just making yourself look foolish.
Post new comment