July 30, 2008 - 3:13pm

Are primaries good for the GOP?

After the dust settles from the election the question will be asked whether or not competitive primaries, in both congressional districts, benefited the Republican Party.

Did the primaries help or hinder voter outreach? What if there are lingering harsh feelings? Should the candidates have used tougher words on U.S. Rep. Paul Hodes (D-Concord) and U.S. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-Rochester) instead of on each other? These are just some of the "what if" questions that will be examined after November, especially if Republicans fail to gain a congressional seat.

Another question is what role the party chairman should play in primaries? Besides staying neutral between campaigns, is there a point when the chair should intervene for the sake of the party?

New Hampshire Republican Party Chairman Fergus Cullen said that the party chairman should "potentially" step into primaries that are more focused on individuals rather than policy issues and cited the 2002 gubernatorial primary as an example.

"In the 2002 gubernatorial primary John Dowd, who was then head of the Republican Party, had a sit-down with the campaigns and laid out the boundaries of what was and was not acceptable," Cullen said.

When asked if he would, or already has, intervened in the recent spat between Jennifer Horn (R-Nashua) and Grant Bosse (R-Hillsboro) in their race for Congress, Cullen said, "the Bosse, Horn discussion was only seen by a handful of insiders. In 2002 it involved paid media so it was very well-known, so in that case the chairman got involved."

Fran Wendelboe, head of the New Hampshire Reagan Network, said primaries should remain focused on the issues.

"I think Fergus should always encourage civility," Wendelboe said. "Grant Bosse's question about how Jennifer Horn spent her money is a legitimate question but when it turns away from that then it's not acceptable. I assume Fergus did give a call into the candidates."

Cullen said he "absolutely" believes that primaries benefit his party.

"I absolutely believe it, there's no question about it," Cullen said. "The Democrats also used to have primaries but that's no longer the case."

Cullen said primaries force candidates to be sharper on the stump and work harder, especially in state races.

"If you don't have your plans down, your lines down by Labor Day, in many cases it's too late," Cullen said.

Wendelboe agreed with Cullen that primaries help the party and said most activists are able to work together after a primary.

"The 2002 race between John Sununu and Bob Smith was very competitive but for the most part people were able to come together afterwards," Wendelboe said. "This time around I don't see any major divisions within the party."

Wendelboe has endorsed former U.S. Rep. Jeb Bradley (R-Wolfeboro) but said "whoever is the nominee I will work hard for them."

Dean Spiliotes, a New Hampshire political analyst, also said that the congressional primaries would benefit the Republicans.

"If you have an interesting primary that can't be bad for the Republicans," he said, citing the fact it could help grassroots Republicans get involved.

Spiliotes added that the Republicans will probably unite after the primaries. "If there's a chance they could win the seat they'll unite behind someone."

Comments

Don't do it!


I don't think it is good for the Republican party to have primaries because there is some small chance that this activity will reveal Republican positions, opinions, and accomplishments, which aren't supported by New Hampshire voters. Voters here support health care, energy assistance, education, fairness in taxation, openness in state tax reporting, minimum wage, civil unions, having a veteran's hospital, rebuilding the state's infrastructure instead of the wealthy's bank accounts, creation of jobs, local help with natural disasters not the ones generated by hedge funds and Bear Sterns. When people examine a policy whose total focus is cutting taxes on rich people and services to poor people, they run the other way. Keep your motivations hidden, I recommend.

07/31/08 8:24 am

that's funny


That's funny William, because not only do Democrats act un-democratically, in essence having the elite Democrat ruling class force their anointed on the ignorant rank-and-file masses (when was the last Democratic primary here?) but Democrats are anti-workers rights (support for Employee "Free Choice" Act), they support limiting job growth and advancement (minimum wage increases bump up the unemployment numbers), Democrats support tax increases on oil which make it more expensive for NH citizens to heat their homes and purchase consumer goods, Democrats support massive deficit spending, significant budget shortfalls, growth in the size and scope of government at all levels which breeds corruption and inefficiency, Democrats support wasteful and ineffective Federal programs like FEMA (yeah, that's provenly effective!).

"Cutting taxes for rich people and services to poor people" is the same class warfare that Democrats have been engaging in for decades, and the intelligent, motivated, hardworking, self-sufficient citizens of New Hampshire are sick and tired of the Democrats Business-As-Usual!!!

07/31/08 11:11 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.