OSSIPEE -- A loose format allowed former U.S. Rep. Jeb Bradley (R-Wolfeboro) and former Health and Human Services Commissioner John Stephen (R-Manchester) to participate in the fiercest debate this election cycle.
Bradley and Stephen were allowed to rebut each other and directly question one another Monday night at the debate sponsored by the Carroll County Republicans. The two touched upon issues ranging from energy to earmarks and the current situation in Georgia.
The debate got off to a quick start with an exchange over whether or not Stephen increased property taxes while at HHS. This morning Bradley held a press conference with various state representatives and county commissioners to argue that Stephen did not fully fund Medicare reimbursements for nursing homes, which resulted in counties picking-up a larger share than anticipated.
"The representatives and commissioners were there with me in saying that property taxes went up because under John's tenure at the Department of Health and Human Services bills were simply not paid and someone else had to pay. That's not cost saving that's cost shifting," Bradley said. "I would contend that's not the kind of leadership we need in Washington."
Stephen said that he increased spending on nursing homes and Bradley is running away from his own record.
"I looked up the rates when I took over as Commissioner, the rates for Carroll County was $137 in 2003 per day per senior. When I left it was $169 dollars. 30 percent increase in Carroll County in the rates being made. A 30 percent increase and that's what you call it a cost shift when property tax payers are hurt," Stephen said. "You know at the ending of the day Jeb you're not a fiscal conservative."
Stephen later displayed a graph that showed an increase in reimbursement levels during his reign at HHS.
Another tense moment came when Bradley pressed Stephen to answer whether or not Stephen would have voted for a defense bill that included earmarks.
"Yes or no commissioner, are you voting for that defense bill or not," asked Bradley.
Stephen replied, "Jeb I'm going to Washington to bring change. I don't want to have any representative of Congress, ever, where you have to vote for all this wasteful pork."
Stephen has taken a no earmarks pledge, while Bradley said he supports earmarks that benefit the armed services.
At the ending of the debate the two rivals pledged to endorse and campaign for the eventual nominee.
Also attending the debate were New Hampshire Republican Chairman Fergus Cullen, state Sen. and gubernatorial candidate Joe Kenney (R-Wakefield) and state senate candidates Sam Cataldo and Bill Denley.
EARLIER on PolitickerNH.com:
The year 2008 brought many fun memories for New Hampshire political junkies. From Hillary's tear in Portsmouth to the >
Another county that moved toward the Democrats in the 1960s and 1970s was Carroll County. By the end of the ‘70s, Carroll was still strongly ... >
Listening to the radio
Listening to the radio debate and articles summarizing the other debates I have decided that John Stephen can not answer a question directly, he again illustrated this common trait of his today.
Thank you Jeb for your work
Thank you Jeb for your work with veterans, armed forces and our economy. You have greatly helped the veterans of New Hampshire through your work with the emergency room.
Jeb Bradley "The Right Kind
Jeb Bradley "The Right Kind of Change." Keep campaigning Mr. Bradley we need you back in Washington.
John Stephen does not have
John Stephen does not have enough notoriety to win nomination and take on incumbent Shea Porter.
Jeb Bradley has the experience and record to bring the much needed.
Change
You all think choosing a guy associated with the Bush Congress during a down Republican year is a good idea? John Stephen has much less baggage than Bradley.
Bradley and CSP have at least one thing in common, they are both rubber stamps for their parties, evidenced by the fact that Boehner is apparently coming to stump for Bradley now, he wants a sure vote, not someone like Stephen who will actually stand up for fiscal responsibility.
ThereAndBack?
Does this mean you are looking for John Stephen to vote with the democrats? Boehner is a conservative Congressman, coming from a conservative district. Why would we elect someone to represent the Republican party if they are going to run away from Republican values because they are scared of being labeled a "rubber stamp"?!?
Bradley is polling ahead of CSP and Bradley represents New Hampshire's Republican values!
Post new comment