Wendelboe starts alternative party site

First JoKe Kenney's Op Ed in the Union Leader bashing the party, now this!

It is again a great day to be a Democrat!

Please continue the back biting and in-fighting in the NH GOP!

Senator Lynch I presume?

This is the perfect storm for State Republicans. Let all the nutcases wander over to Wendlesbowl and then take back your party.

is not by living in the past. Do Republicans really think that their continued worship of a dead president will attract young people to the party?

Fran as chairman = a horrible idea. New Hampshire needs this divisive player to just get lost.

We don't need all this bickering. It isn't helping anything.

If Republicans can't talk about principles and the conservative direction the party needs to go, then the party is already lost to the socialists. Like I said, if Republicans are to win again in New Hampshire, we need to remove leftists from power and empower conservatives.

Mike, if you don't want to have that conversation and instead want to silence all debate, then you sir are one of the biggest obstacles to the party's success.

A clear understanding of what is happening in this country is that socialists are taking over both parties. In the Democratic party, it is very clear. In the Republican party, it is becoming more clear — particularly with Bush, McCain, Sununu and Gregg's support for the absolutely awful bailout of banks. If that isn't corporate welfare (read: socialism), I don't know what is. In my opinion, Republican support for the bailouts is one major reason why they lost.

Republicans are the party that believe that government is the problem, not the solution. We need to get back to the task of proving this principle, not apologizing for it.

This country was founded as a Republic and this state as one of its most shining examples of a government run by the people. We are losing it, and if we do, we will lose the New Hampshire advantage that your group wants to preserve.

Pretending the truth doesn't exist is not a good way to fight against this wave of socialism and to restore the Republic. The only way to win and restore our Republic is to talk about the truth and to come up with a strategy to reclaim a government of the people, for the people and by the people.

Since the media and schools are increasingly taken over by socialist interests, it is key that they be targeted with a core conservative Republican message. There must be a conservative free-market individual-run solution to every problem, and it must be pumped out constantly and consistently from a strong, conservative Republican Party leader. Otherwise, the people will continue to believe the lies told by Democrats, and we will lose our freedoms.

Property rights, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, due process, the right to bear arms so as to allow the people to protect themselves against an oppressive government, the right to petition the government with grievances, the free press, the right to speak freely about any idea and religious freedom are most under attack. We as Republicans MUST clearly explain why these rights are important, and why they are inalienable. We must show the people how they have lost them and propose a plan to restore them.

If you think this is divisive Mike, then maybe you're a Democrat. Maybe you're one of those socialists in the Republican party I'm referring to. Open discussion and debate must be had to restore New Hampshire so that "Live free or Die" are not just empty words.

Look Mitchell, it's clear you have no clue from what you just said and that you didn't read what I wrote, either. Republicans tried to win this election with centrists such as John McCain and in our state, Sununu. They claimed to be conservatives, but were not by any stretch of the imagination. Since most people are not stupid, they rejected them.

Any thinking person knows that George Bush is no conservative Republican. I would argue that he is not Republican at all. Your idea that Republicanism has become the new liberal is ludicrous. Everyone knows that "progressive" is the new "liberal," which really means "socialist" anyway. People didn't vote for socialists, they voted against the fake Republicans who would have continued us down the same wrong path as Bush.

I'll give the Dems credit. They called McCain and Sununu for what they were: Bush clones. If Republicans want to win, they must return to conservatism, not run from it.

As clear evidence that I am right: the only reason anyone thought McCain had any chance at all was because he picked conservative Palin for his running mate. His numbers shot through the roof when he announced her and after her conservative speech. When the public realized McCain was going to throw her under the bus after the media went after her for absolutely ridiculous reasons, while ignoring their true duty to report evenly against Republican and Democratic candidates, they realized that she wouldn't have any authority in his administration, and he again lost support. McCain was no and is no Republican. Look at what the fool told India today (not to retaliate against the people who attacked them). What kind of nonsense is that?

In other news, every single conservative ballot initiative to confirm marriage is between a man and a woman passed, even in California. You're dreaming if you think conservatism is what Americans voted against. If there were conservatives running for election, they would have won.

This election came down to the economy and the Republican-in-name-only response to it, as well as the Iraq War, which is not really a conservative idea anyway. Conservatives believe that war is reserved for defensive reasons when the nation's immediate interest is under attack. Neo-cons, as they're called, who are really statists (read: totalitarians), are simply not conservative. "Compassionate conservatism" is not conservatism, it's socialism.

The Americans rejected the socialist Republicans in name only and gave the Dems the chance to turn the heat up quickly. Perhaps I'm wrong, but my guess is the frog is going to jump out of the pot before Obama leaves office. Conservatism needs to return to the Republican Party and it will return.

But you're a Democrat anyway, Mitchell, so why don't you mind your own business and enjoy your short lived adventure in destroying this country so the people again see that government is causing their problems, not solving them.

Hear, hear Free Thinker. It's clear these Democrats are giddy about winning nationally because of idiot Bush, who I agree is a socialist just like Obama, Gregg and Sununu.

What Democrats fail to realize is that the Republicans picked up several seats in the state Legislature, showing that if anything, the party is gaining strength in New Hampshire. It would be interesting to see how conservative those Republicans are. I bet they are quite a bit conservative.

Let the Democrats ride on the anti-McCain, anti-Bush coattails for some time. Once they screw up the country enough, we're going to see a swing far right, and it will be good.

Republicans out there, don't listen to these Democrats who dominate this Democratic media outlet, and others. Don't let them fool you. The so-called Republican Union Leader is just as Democratic as any other newspaper out there. Maybe it's owner isn't, but look at the articles. The reek of left-wing diatribe.

Fran has already said her site was temporary, until the Republicans grew some balls, returned to their roots and started hitting these idiot Democrats hard. It's time to return to the age of reason, and leave these emotional carpet baggers in the dust. Go Fran go! Republican leaders: if you don't want to go extinct, maybe you'll start listening to her. Or maybe a third party will replace you like you replaced the Whigs. Someone has to stand for Liberty in this land.

-- A 20-something Republican who wants real change (so that we can be free again)

Both pages look like they were made in a Middle School computer class.

Why do so many of these long posts supporting Fran under different names all sound like they were written by the same person (read Fran).